3.”They Live in Very Difficult Conditions” Is the Most Understated News Headline We’ve Ever Seen

This dramatic picture from Colombia, together with what might be the most subdued news description for the year, makes a strong statement about protest and living circumstances. The picture shows a man who buried himself alive in protest against his living circumstances; this fact makes the accompanying caption “They live in very difficult conditions” seem almost humorously inadequate. Seeing someone actually buried, probably with some breathing equipment, immediately and viscerally generates desperation that goes beyond the need for specific explanation. Although risky, this kind of aggressive protest does a far greater job than any written account of the seriousness of the problem. The simple caption and the dramatic graphic help to underline the sometimes ridiculous gap between news media presentation and the weight of the events they cover. Though the picture begs major issues regarding the extent people must go to get their voices heard in current society, this particular protest technique, extreme as it is, succeeded in bringing attention to the situation of its subject.
4.Nothing to See Here

This shocking picture begs major ethical and privacy issues about monitoring sensitive areas. The picture depicts a surveillance camera placed inside a restroom stall, a configuration that sets off alarms about personal privacy rights and possible legal infringement right away. Although some readers have proposed this may be connected to drug testing facilities, even such a background wouldn’t always make the arrangement ethical or lawful. The camera’s disconnected condition in the picture offers minimal comfort since it is impossible to confirm its later running condition. The very presence of such surveillance tools in a bathroom environment emphasises the difficult equilibrium current society’s security measures against personal privacy rights. Particularly in areas where people have a realistic expectation of privacy, this situation calls for careful debate on suitable limits for surveillance and the defence of personal liberty. The picture makes one worried about how monitoring technologies could be abused even in the most private of environments.
